misquoted.ai vs Otterly
Otterly tracks a long list of prompts across six AI engines, priced by prompt volume. misquoted.ai goes deeper on fewer questions and reports accuracy, not just visibility. Pick the one that matches the job.
What you pay, what you get
Read the tiers before the marketing copy. Both columns are pulled from each vendor's public pricing as of April 2026.
- Free scan$0
- AI Readiness Report$49 one-time
- Full Accuracy Report$199 one-time
- Monitor Standard (monthly)$399/mo
- Monitor Pro (weekly)$599/mo
- Multi-brand bundlesfrom $899/mo
- Lite$29/mo
- Standard$89/mo
- Pro$209/mo
- Business$549/mo
- Enterprise$989/mo
- Accuracy / correction playbookNot offered
What each tool actually measures
Different questions, different answers. Read the methodology before reading the score.
Accuracy across three models
We send 50–80 questions about your brand through ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in parallel. The score combines model agreement, factual correctness against your site, and the SEO-for-AI signals on your domain. The deliverable is a consensus matrix and a correction playbook.
The interesting failure mode for us is when models disagree. If ChatGPT says one price and Gemini says another, your brand is two different things to two different customers. We rank disagreements by severity.
"Visibility tells you they're talking. Accuracy tells you they're right."
Prompt visibility across engines
Otterly lets you define a list of prompts — sometimes hundreds — and tracks which engines mention your brand in the response, how often, and in what position. Six engines as of April 2026: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, Mistral, and Microsoft Copilot.
It's a real strength: broader engine coverage than most, and prompt-level granularity for marketers who want to track many queries. The output is closer to a rank-tracker for AI search than a fact-checker.
"How often do we show up across the prompts we care about?"
Fifteen things buyers ask about
Marked based on each vendor's public docs as of April 2026.
| Feature | misquoted.ai | Otterly |
|---|---|---|
| Scanning | ||
| AI engines coveredModels monitored per scan | 3ChatGPT · Claude · Gemini | 6+ Perplexity, Mistral, Copilot |
| Question / prompt count per scan | 50–80 generated | Per-tier prompt cap |
| Custom prompt entry | Roadmap | ✓ |
| Site crawl for ground truth | ✓ | ✗ |
| Reporting | ||
| Composite readiness score | ✓ | Visibility % |
| Per-claim consensus matrix | ✓ | ✗ |
| Position / mention rank tracking | ✗ | ✓ |
| Editorial PDF report | ✓ | Dashboard export |
| Accuracy | ||
| Fact-checked claim scoring | ✓ | ✗ |
| Correction playbook | ✓ | ✗ |
| Source verification per claim | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring | ||
| Re-scan cadence | Monthly or weekly | Daily prompt polling |
| Email alerts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Competitor benchmarking | ✓$49 tier and above | ✓ |
| Multi-brand bundles | 3, 10, 20+ | Workspaces |
| Integrations | ||
| Slack / webhook alerts | Roadmap | ✓ |
| API access | Roadmap | Pro+ |
Where each tool genuinely wins
Otterly does more of what it does. We do something else.
Where misquoted is the better pick
When the question is "what are the models getting wrong about us?"
- 01Accuracy scoring, not just mention counting.The $199 report checks every claim against your site. Otterly doesn't fact-check — it tracks whether you appear.
- 02A correction playbook you can ship.Every disputed claim becomes an llms.txt entry or schema.org snippet. Otterly tells you the gap; we close it.
- 03Editorial reports buyers will read.Our PDFs are written for the CMO, not the marketer who runs the tool. Otterly is dashboard-first.
- 04One-time $49 entry tier.Sometimes you don't need ongoing tracking. You need one good report. Otterly's lowest paid tier is $29/mo recurring.
- 05Consensus matrix is the headline output.Which models say what, ranked by how much they disagree. No equivalent in Otterly.
Where Otterly is the better pick
Real strengths. If these are your priorities, Otterly is a thoughtful answer.
- 01Six engines, not three.Mistral, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot are real surfaces. If you sell into an EU enterprise that prefers Mistral, or you care about Perplexity citations, Otterly covers them today.
- 02Prompt-level rank tracking.If your job is "track 200 specific prompts and tell me when our position changes," Otterly is built for that shape of work in a way we are not.
- 03Scales by volume, not frequency.A small business tracking 20 prompts can stay at $29/mo. A larger brand tracking thousands stays inside one product.
Total cost of ownership
Annual spend at the tier most buyers land on.
misquoted.ai — Monitor Standard 1 brand
- Monthly 50–80 question scan, three models
- Full consensus matrix every scan
- Trend dashboard, accuracy over time
- Email alerts on score delta or claim flip
- AI Readiness Certification Badge
Correction playbook is a separate $199 one-time. Multi-brand bundles drop the per-brand cost ~25–50%.
Otterly — Pro
- Tracks a capped number of prompts (per-tier)
- Six engines, daily polling
- Position and visibility share metrics
- Slack and email alerts
- No accuracy or correction features
Cheaper monthly. Different product. If you outgrow Pro, the next step is Business at $549/mo and Enterprise at $989/mo.
Prompt tracking vs. fact tracking
Otterly answers "how visible are we across the prompts our team cares about, across six engines." That is a real question for marketers who run AI search like a rank-tracking program. misquoted.ai answers "what are the models saying about us, are they right, and how do we fix the gaps." Different work.
If you need broad engine coverage and prompt-level granularity, Otterly is built for that. If you need a defensible answer to "the CEO asked ChatGPT a question and the answer was wrong — what now?", we built misquoted for exactly that conversation.
You can use both. Otterly for ongoing visibility tracking, misquoted for the one-time accuracy audit and the correction playbook. They don't overlap much.
Find out what three models actually say about your brand
Ninety seconds. Three models. Free. If you've never seen the consensus matrix, the free scan is the fastest way to understand what we mean by accuracy.